Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Constitution Packaging Safety and Redesign
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-01-12 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Validation Results
Content Quality - PASS ✅
- Specification focuses on WHAT and WHY, not HOW
- No mention of specific programming languages or frameworks in requirements
- User scenarios written from user/business perspective
- All mandatory sections (User Scenarios, Requirements, Success Criteria) completed
Requirement Completeness - PASS ✅
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers present
- All 27 functional requirements are testable (FR-001 through FR-027)
- Success criteria use measurable metrics (verify with commands, Content-Length > 0, completes without errors)
- Success criteria avoid implementation (e.g., "Dashboard serves HTML content" not "asyncio event loop works")
- Acceptance scenarios cover all four user stories with Given/When/Then format
- Edge cases identify boundary conditions (customized constitution during upgrade, killed processes, repeated runs)
- Scope bounded to four specific goals with clear boundaries
- Dependencies identified (pyproject.toml changes, template manager updates, migration system)
Feature Readiness - PASS ✅
- Each functional requirement maps to acceptance scenario in user stories
- User scenarios prioritized (P1: Safe dogfooding & Optional constitution, P2: Windows dashboard & Smooth upgrades)
- Each story independently testable with specific verification steps
- Success criteria measurable (zero filled-in files, 100% commands work, completes in X minutes)
- No implementation leakage (avoids mentioning Python, asyncio, specific file structures beyond what's necessary)
Notes
All checklist items pass. Specification is ready for /spec-kitty.plan.
The specification successfully captures all four goals: 1. Packaging safety (FR-001 through FR-006) - Clear separation of templates vs runtime artifacts 2. Optional constitution (FR-007 through FR-016) - Interactive discovery with minimal/comprehensive modes 3. Windows dashboard fix (FR-017 through FR-020) - Platform-appropriate signal handling 4. Upgrade migrations (FR-021 through FR-027) - Graceful handling of missing dependencies
All requirements are testable, measurable, and technology-agnostic at the appropriate abstraction level.