Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Planning Artifact and Query Consistency
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-08 Mission: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Mission Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
All items pass. Ready for /spec-kitty.plan.
Key contract decisions recorded in the spec:
- Planning-artifact work packages remain outside the execution lane graph and resolve to repository root.
- Lifecycle status lanes remain separate from execution-lane membership.
- Query mode is read-only, does not require
--agent, and exposesmission_state: "not_started"pluspreview_stepfor fresh runs. - Advancing mode remains the only state-mutating path and still requires
--agentwith--result.