Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Canonical Baseline and Repository Boundary

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-10 Feature: spec.md Revision: 3 (post-plan-review, namespace key and slug semantics corrected)

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Review Findings Addressed

  • ✅ P1 (rev 2): Identity model is internally consistent (repository_uuid is local, project_uuid is optional SaaS binding)
  • ✅ P2 (rev 2): repo_slug downgraded from identity (but see rev 3 correction below)
  • ✅ P1 (rev 3): repository_uuid explicitly replaces project_uuid as required namespace key for body sync, queue dedup, upstream contract (FR-013, Scenario 7)
  • ✅ P1 (rev 3): repo_slug retains current owner/repo meaning; new field repository_label introduced for display name (FR-005, FR-006, C-006, Invariant 6)
  • ✅ P2 (rev 3): Wire protocol dual-write explicitly covers both UUID and label renames (research.md R3, quickstart.md step 6)

Notes

  • All items pass validation. Spec is ready for /spec-kitty.tasks.
  • Revision 3 addresses plan review findings: namespace key gap, repo_slug semantic flip, and dual-write omission.
  • Seven user scenarios cover: new user, contributor, SaaS consumer, multi-repo future, tracker integration, existing repository migration, and body sync after migration.