Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Agent Skills Support for Codex and Vibe
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-14 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Note on implementation detail: The spec references specific filesystem paths (.agents/skills/, .codex/prompts/, .vibe/), binary names (vibe), and registry names (AGENT_SKILL_CONFIG, AI_CHOICES). These are intrinsic to the feature — the observable contract between Spec Kitty and the external Vibe/Codex CLIs is literally "write these named files into these named directories." They are user-visible integration surfaces, not internal implementation choices, and the acceptance scenarios would be untestable without them. No code-level structure, framework, or language choice is prescribed.
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- P0 research validated the user's suspicion that Codex's current integration (
.codex/prompts/) uses a path OpenAI has deprecated in favor of Agent Skills discovered from.agents/skills/. This reshaped the mission from "add Vibe" to "add Vibe + modernize Codex onto the same Agent Skills renderer." - Constraint C-005 forbids a Mistral-only code path: the renderer must be generic and Codex must be the second native consumer in the same release. This guards against shipping a one-off Vibe integration next to a legacy Codex one.
- Skill Ownership Manifest format is intentionally left open for the plan phase. The spec only requires that ownership be trackable with no false positives; format and location are implementation decisions.
- Vendor-specific skill roots (
.vibe/skills/,~/.codex/skills/) are explicitly out of scope for this release. Users can follow up in a later mission if demand warrants.