Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: CI Pipeline Honesty — Actionable Fixes
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-15 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — file/line pointers are traceability, not prescribed implementation
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (honest CI verdicts for maintainers + fleet)
- ✅ Written for the maintainer/fleet audience
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (decision verify: clean)
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (coverage ≥90%, byte-identical blocking, zero lint/type issues)
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (outcome-framed: complete/non-empty-matrix/distinct-label/failure)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined (RED-first per story)
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (four fixes in; cluster + #4374/#4420/#4429 out)
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified (C-004 self-referential CI verification; #4454/#4208 both touch ci-router.yml)
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
regression test obligation, and each fix carries a RED-first ATDD entry point (NFR-002).
- All items pass. The binding invariant (NFR-001, no fix widens the green path) is pinned by a
- Ready for
/spec-kitty.plan.