Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: CLI Interview Decision Moments
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-23 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details beyond what the product is
- ✅ Focused on user value (ask-time paper trail, idempotency, local-first)
- ✅ Written for stakeholders (mission owners + downstream consumers)
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types separated (FR/NFR/C)
- ✅ IDs unique across FR/NFR/C
- ✅ All rows have Status
- ✅ NFRs have measurable thresholds (200ms p95, 90% coverage, 10% suite-regression cap)
- ✅ Success criteria measurable (SC-1..SC-7)
- ✅ Success criteria technology-agnostic where user-facing
- ✅ 8 acceptance scenarios + edge cases defined
- ✅ Scope bounded (V1 charter+specify+plan only; widening/saas/tasks out)
- ✅ Dependencies + assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- ✅ Every FR has clear acceptance criteria (via scenarios + edge cases)
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (charter, specify, plan, defer, cancel, Other, idempotency, verify, local-first)
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes in SC-1..SC-7
- ✅ No implementation details leak into spec (implementation details intentional where they're load-bearing: CLI subgroup shape, file paths, event log name — these are product contracts)
Notes
- All items pass on first validation. Ready for
/spec-kitty.plan.