Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Doctor mission-state legacy repair & report fidelity

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-20 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Full-seam scope confirmed by operator (#4778 + #4780 + #4779 + audit/fix reconciliation); scanner unification (#2720) explicitly out of scope.
  • NFR thresholds: NFR-003 = 100% of failing missions triage-able from one invocation; NFR-004 = ≤10% wall-clock regression.
  • Content-quality note: because the deliverable is CLI command behavior, the spec references observable command surfaces (--fix, --teamspace-dry-run, --json) as user-facing behavior, not internal implementation; specific modules/functions are deferred to plan.