Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Doctrine Enrichment — Frontend, Brownfield, and Tactic Normalization
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-26 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified (profile boundary between Freddy and Norris; BDD paradigm vs SbE coexistence; attribution path; empty-repo test; toolchain-agnostic procedure)
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (routing decision, tactic discovery, review workflow, BDD lifecycle, CI inheritance test)
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
All checklist items pass. Ready for /spec-kitty.plan.