Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: DRG Read-Path Bridge

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-08-19 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details in normative sections (seams isolated in non-normative Technical Context)
  • ✅ Focused on user/operator value (org-authored dependencies actually cascade)
  • ✅ Written for stakeholders with a plain-language overview
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (fold-#3573 decision resolved per brief)
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (C-004: cascade completeness out of scope)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified (enabling for M3/M4)

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (edges cascade, warning honest, validator reconciled)
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into normative specification

Notes

  • All items pass. #3573 is folded (C-001) so the validator and runtime flip atomically.
  • Ready for /spec-kitty.plan.