Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Execution-State Domain Remediation — #1619 Strangler Fig

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-03 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (coord-unavailable fail-closed, legacy mission compat, on-disk backward compat)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (out-of-scope items explicit: MissionRunStartedPayload, BookkeepingTransaction internals, step 5 communication-artefact consolidation)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • FR-001 through FR-035 mapped directly from GitHub issues #1663, #1664, #1667, #1672, #1673, #1674
  • Dependency ordering (ADRs → ratchet → step 2a/b/c → step 3) is captured in both the Source Issues table and in Constraints C-001 through C-003
  • All items pass — spec is ready for /spec-kitty.plan