Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Gate-Artifact Merge Driver Unit Gate
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-08-10 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — reconciler names are the WHAT (the surface under test), not a HOW prescription
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (regression coverage for the merge invariant)
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (purpose_tldr/context legible)
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (NFR-003 < 5 s; NFR-001 no-I/O binary; NFR-002 negative-control-per-assertion)
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (outcome-framed: gap closed, non-vacuity, pending admitted)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified (conflict marker, anti-vacuity, pending-admissible)
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (C-001/C-002/C-003 name the out-of-scope surfaces)
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified (reconciler surface from #3076; marker + #3231 excluded)
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- All items pass. Spec is ready for
/spec-kitty.plan. - Narrow, well-researched scope (scoping brief: scratchpad
3232-scoping-brief.md).