Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Landing-Pass Campsite Follow-ups

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-07-15 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — surfaces named as domain concepts; the how lives in the plan/research note
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (contributor + CI stop losing time to avoidable red main)
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (purpose + scenarios readable without code)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (dev-tooling context noted; framed as observable green/red + zero-error outcomes)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined (A–D)
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (parallel-run race; stale command; legacy sentinel)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (explicit in/out lists + traceability table)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Direction A (#2671) is operator-resolved and recorded as C-008; not deferred.
  • One assumption (Lane sentinel promotion, FR-010) is flagged for plan-time confirmation.