Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Mission-identity naming seam & #1908 panel hardening

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-15 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details beyond the named bug surfaces (necessary to scope defect fixes)
  • ✅ Focused on correctness/robustness value
  • ✅ Readable by a technical stakeholder
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are verifiable
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined (one per issue)
  • ✅ Edge cases identified (embedded-slug, coincidental-8-char, multi-dep conflict)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (two clusters, explicit out-of-scope)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ Every FR maps to an addressed issue with a clear acceptance scenario
  • ✅ User scenarios cover the primary flows (merge / compose / parse / lane / base-ref / accept)
  • ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes in Success Criteria
  • ✅ Bounded conflict surface stated (NFR-001) for rebase-safety

Notes

its merge depends on the #1978 fix (C-005).

#1868/#1795/#1666/#1914 (C-002), never under #1929.

  • TDD-first (FR-009/C-001): every fix lands with a failing-then-passing regression test.
  • Sequencing: #1978 is prioritized — this mission's own slug embeds its mid8, so
  • #1929 is a meta-checklist tracker; findings parent under functional epics