Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Org-Pack Subdir Source & Doctrine QoL

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-23 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — brownfield exception: the #2083 issue specifies the subdir field as the contract; concrete surface names are intentional and bounded.
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (Purpose section is stakeholder-facing)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (user/developer-facing outcomes)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (path-escape exception, no-subdir backward compat)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (#1843 doctrine-only slice; explicit Out of Scope)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification (beyond the bounded brownfield contract noted above)

Notes

  • The one scope fork (#1843 fold-whole vs slice) was resolved with the operator: doctrine-only slice (FR-010/FR-011), enforcement deferred to epic #1843.
  • Brownfield note: several FRs reference concrete config fields/code surfaces (subdir, effective_root, named consumer sites) because #2083 proposes the field as the literal contract and the post-spec squad required enumerating the real resolution consumers; this is a deliberate, bounded exception to the "no implementation detail" guidance, not requirement leakage.
  • Revised 2026-06-23 after the post-spec adversarial squad (research/post-spec-squad-findings.md): the seam was moved from resolve_org_roots to the OrgPackConfig/registry level (BLOCKER correction), security timing split, Thread B/C de-faked, and FR-007/FR-008 added. #2092 folded as Thread D; #2080 ruled a follow-up mission.
  • 13 FRs, 3 NFRs, 7 constraints, 6 success criteria, 5 scenarios. All items pass; ready for /spec-kitty.plan.