Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Owned-checkout lifecycle authority
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-28 Mission: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
- ✅ Every FR row and success criterion carries a delivery label and no-op mark
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Mission Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
- This is a CLI tool, so user-facing command names and flags (for example
--owned-checkout,agent tasks status) are part of the user surface, not implementation detail. Internal module and function names are kept out of the requirements and live inresearch/pre-spec-options-memo.md. - The validated-ownership design choice (typed carrier) is an operator-locked constraint, recorded as C-001/C-002/C-005 and FR-001, not as an implementation prescription.