Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: CLI Private Teamspace Ingress Safeguards

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-05-01 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • Note: HTTP endpoint paths (/api/v1/me, /api/v1/events/batch/, /api/v1/ws-token) and source-tree paths are part of the contract surface of this mission (the bug is defined by which endpoints are called with which header values). They are intentionally retained as scope anchors and named only at the contract layer, not as implementation prescriptions.
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (preserving local command success when sync session is degraded; preventing SaaS-side rejection of every authenticated user with shared-only teams)
  • ✅ Written for stakeholders who understand the SaaS↔CLI trust boundary; non-engineering stakeholders may need the glossary in the Domain Language section
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value (all Approved)
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (NFR-001 single-GET cap, NFR-002 structured-log shape, NFR-003 100% strict-JSON parseable, NFR-004 zero regressions in named tests)
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable (SC-001..SC-004 all express counts/percentages or byte-identical conditions)
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic at the user-outcome layer (SC-003 talks about "user's session was healthy"; SC-004 about "operators reading logs")
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined (AC-001..AC-009 cover all 7 brief acceptance criteria plus exit-code and refresh paths)
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (Scenarios 3, 4, 5, 6 cover failed rehydrate, drifting default, refresh after server-side change, and strict-sync exit semantics)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (Out of Scope section names SaaS-side change, non-ingress UI, tracker reads, and pick_default_team_id rename)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria (AC-001..AC-009 map FR/NFR ids explicitly)
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (Scenarios 1–6)
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria (SC-001..SC-004)
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification beyond the contract-surface endpoints/paths called out in Content Quality

Notes

  • Spec is ready for /spec-kitty.plan.
  • Brief lives at ../spec-kitty-start-here.md (outside the repo). It will not be auto-deleted post-commit because it is not in .kittify/.
  • The diagnostic line ❌ Connection failed: Forbidden: Direct sync ingress must target Private Teamspace. printed after the mission create --json JSON object is itself a manifestation of the bug FR-009 / AC-006 will fix; recording it here as live evidence.