Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Profile Invocation Runtime and Audit Trail

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-21 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for business stakeholders (with appropriate technical vocabulary for this domain)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria (mapped in SC-### table)
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (US-1 through US-9)
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • All items pass. Spec is ready for /spec-kitty.plan.
  • ADR-3 is designated as a required mission deliverable (FR-010, C-008) — not pre-empted in the spec, to be resolved during the plan phase.
  • intake non-integration is explicit (FR-018, C-005), not an oversight.
  • Workflow composition hooks are documented as a constraint (C-004, FR-019) with no implementation.