Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Relocate SaaS-Sync Flag to Core

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-07-04 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details beyond what the mission's subject requires — module paths/symbol names are the subject of a relocation mission, kept deliberately
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (architectural boundary integrity)
  • ✅ Written for stakeholders (the boundary rule + "no behavior change" are legible)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain — the 2 design decisions (target module, shim-vs-delete) are explicitly deferred to plan via C-002 + Assumptions, not blocking markers
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (boundary enforced, behavior identical)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (no second authority; ATDD red-first)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (Out of Scope names the exclusions)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak beyond the relocation subject

Notes

  • Target CORE module + saas/rollout.py fate are plan-phase design decisions (C-002); both honor the single-canonical-authority principle.
  • ATDD red-first hook (C-004): removing the ALLOWLIST entry reds test_no_core_imports_integration until the relocation lands.