Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Nonfatal setup-plan auth diagnostics
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-08-23 Mission: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No
[NEEDS CLARIFICATION]markers remain - ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Mission Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification
Notes
failures are isolated from local verification while remaining fail-closed for hosted delivery.
setup-plan completion check succeed.
- Validated against GitHub issue #3621 and the confirmed Intent Summary.
- Expanded during planning by explicit operator decision: all hosted-sync boundary
- The optional fail-closed flag and generic token-expiry UX are explicitly out of scope.
- Ready for
/spec-kitty.planafter the mission-aware specification commit and