Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: Single Mission-Surface Resolver
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before /spec-kitty.plan Created: 2026-06-19 Mission: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details that overconstrain (seam names cited as intent, not prescription)
- ✅ Focused on operability value (commands agree on the authoritative surface)
- ✅ Written for stakeholders (the desync problem + the consolidation goal)
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (Q1 hard-fail + Q2 all-6 resolved at discovery)
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs unique across FR/NFR/C/SC
- ✅ All requirement rows have a Status
- ✅ NFRs include measurable thresholds (input-class coverage, ruff/mypy 0, 100% existing suites)
- ✅ Success criteria measurable + technology-agnostic-where-possible
- ✅ Acceptance scenarios defined (primary + coord-empty + ambiguous-mid8 + bypass)
- ✅ Edge cases identified (create→first-write window vs coord-empty)
- ✅ Scope bounded (selection only; validation out of scope)
- ✅ Dependencies/assumptions identified
Mission Readiness
- ✅ All FRs have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows + the decided hard-fail policy
- ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation detail leaks beyond intent-level seam citations
Notes
- Decisions locked at discovery: Q1→B coord-empty hard-fail (
STATUS_READ_PATH_NOT_FOUNDmessage names both recovery paths: collapse/flatten OR recreate/populate the coord branch); Q2→A all 6 increments in one mission (the safety net — audit + guard + equivalence test — de-risks the collapse within the same mission). - Issue matrix is a seed; the adjacent-issues + boyscout-tidy-first squads (post-spec) will expand foldable scope before plan.
- Reuses 01KVFTFV scaffolding (audit AST walker + load-bearing guard) per C-001.