Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Stabilization Release: Core Bug Fixes

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-04-21 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

All checklist items pass. Spec is ready for /spec-kitty.plan.

Key decisions documented in Assumptions section:

  • Assumption 2 (Qwen placeholder) flagged as low-risk uncertainty to be confirmed during implementation.
  • Assumption 3 (5 MB size cap default) is reasonable and expressed as a named constant per C-003.
  • Assumption 4 (legacy review-claim shapes) covers the complete set of known legacy patterns.