Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: ToolSurfaceContract -- Unified Tool Surface Registry

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-14 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ Implementation details are scoped to architectural constraints (package layout, CLI surface); acceptable given technical nature of this mission
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Technical spec targeted at developers; non-technical clarity not a goal for this mission
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-### (FR-001--FR-018), NFR-### (NFR-001--NFR-005), and C-### (C-001--C-010)
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined (6 scenarios covering primary flow, CI, migration, profile projection, plugin validation, docs lint)
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (multi-tool config, tools without native agent support, gitignored dirs)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (plugin bundle = validation/projection only; no marketplace publish; no git-tracking policy change)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ Spec includes CLI and package-layout architectural constraints; this is appropriate for a technical developer-tooling mission

Notes

  • All items pass. Ready for /spec-kitty.plan.
  • Note: spec includes implementation details (package paths, CLI internals, implementation sequence) that are architectural constraints rather than incidental details. This is intentional and appropriate for a technical mission targeting developers. Non-technical stakeholder clarity is not a goal for this mission.