Checklists
requirements.md
Specification Quality Checklist: ToolSurfaceContract Residual Closeout
Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-06-15 Feature: spec.md
Content Quality
- ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — file/symbol references are scoping context for a dev mission, requirements stay outcome-stated
- ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (honest epic closure; enforced gates)
- ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (purpose TLDR + scenarios)
- ✅ All mandatory sections completed
Requirement Completeness
- ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
- ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
- ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
- ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (byte-identical interface, ≤15 complexity, zero new lint/type issues, gate proven by neg+pos test, determinism)
- ✅ Success criteria are measurable
- ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic (outcomes: issues closeable, gate fails on drift)
- ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
- ✅ Edge cases are identified
- ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (4 residuals; epic closure out of scope)
- ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified
Feature Readiness
- ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
- ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- ✅ No implementation details leak into specification (HOW deferred to plan)
Notes
- FR-005's exact CI-wiring mechanism is a deliberate plan-phase decision (recorded in Assumptions), not an unresolved spec gap.
- This mission references GitHub issues (#1940/#1941/#1942/#1944/#1965) → an
issue-matrix.mdwith terminal verdicts is required at accept (C-005).