Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Preserve user assets in migrate --force and git-source fetch

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-26 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — module/function names appear only as issue-provenance context, not as the spec's requirements
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (operator content is never silently destroyed)
  • ✅ Written for stakeholders (the "what/why" of data preservation)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (0 destructive paths, 0 false-success messages, 0 new frameworks)
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (explicit deferred list in C-004)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (one per seed defect + the gate)
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

defects (#4961, #4960, #4989) verified LIVE on the mission base; none superseded.

  • Grounded by a read-only 3-lens squad (see mission research.md ledger F1–F4). All three seed
  • Not a bulk edit (no cross-file identifier rename) → change_mode normal, no occurrence map.
  • Validation passed on iteration 1.