Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Blocked-WP unblock path (alloc-failure recovery)

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-09-11 Feature: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — spec stays at operator-observable behavior; file:line design deferred to plan
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (operator/agent-facing outcomes)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, and C-### entries
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (F-50 + F-51; R3/#1711 and #3938 deferred)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Feature Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (F-50 recovery, F-51 legible refusal)
  • ✅ Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • Discovery minimized per the operator's explicit instruction to run the mission end-to-end; the confirmed scenario and assumptions are recorded in the Intent Summary.
  • Validation passed on iteration 1; all items green.