Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Reject --mission on non-mission-scoped migrate commands

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-10-17 Mission: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — seam names are in Constraints/Deferred as grounding, not in FR/user-value rows
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (agent not silently misled)
  • ✅ Written for non-technical stakeholders (scenarios lead)
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs unique across FR/NFR/C/SC and match the ID grammar
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value (Open)
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds (exit code == 2, 0-byte help diff)
  • ✅ Every FR row and success criterion carries a delivery label and no-op mark
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified (bare flag, two click eras, pack/repo scope, --help)
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (Scope Boundary / Deferred section)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified (#3953/#4964 related-work)

Mission Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows (reject + preserve-normal + preserve-invariant)
  • ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification requirements

Notes

  • Scope decision (include repin-hooks → five total) recorded as resolved Decision Moment 01M5592YNBAT1PC4P7EB2SP3Y9 (operator, 2026-10-17).
  • All items pass on first validation pass.