Checklists

requirements.md

Specification Quality Checklist: Owned single-branch lifecycle authority

Purpose: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning Created: 2026-10-10 Mission: spec.md

Content Quality

  • ✅ No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) — command/surface names are the product vocabulary for this CLI mission; no code structure prescribed
  • ✅ Focused on user value and business needs (operator running owned missions)
  • ✅ Written for the operator/maintainer stakeholder
  • ✅ All mandatory sections completed

Requirement Completeness

  • ✅ No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain (decision ledger clean: 3 resolved, 0 deferred)
  • ✅ Requirements are testable and unambiguous
  • ✅ Requirement types are separated (Functional / Non-Functional / Constraints)
  • ✅ IDs are unique across FR-###, NFR-###, C-### and SC-### entries and match the grammar (FR-006a sub-requirement suffix)
  • ✅ All requirement rows include a non-empty Status value
  • ✅ Non-functional requirements include measurable thresholds
  • ✅ Every FR row and success criterion carries a delivery label and no-op mark
  • ✅ Success criteria are measurable
  • ✅ Success criteria are technology-agnostic
  • ✅ All acceptance scenarios are defined
  • ✅ Edge cases are identified
  • ✅ Scope is clearly bounded (C-002 scope fence)
  • ✅ Dependencies and assumptions identified

Mission Readiness

  • ✅ All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
  • ✅ User scenarios cover primary flows
  • ✅ Mission meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
  • ✅ No implementation details leak into specification

Notes

  • All items pass. The scope is a brownfield bug-fix set of 7 fully-grounded issues; discovery was recorded through three resolved Decision Moments (confirmed-intent, record-analysis authority scope, review-cycle disposition).